Quote:
Originally Posted by InsideThePylons-MW
I've been watching lifetime losers posing as and believing they are wagering experts lure new customers to the cliff and then throw them over repeatedly for 30 years....All these wagering experts believe they are experts because they convinced some moron who knows nothing about wagering to hire them and pay them to be wagering experts.
I'm sorry if I don't want to stand at the bottom of the canyon watching customer after customer falling to their death and me saying "excuse me Mr. or Mrs. Wagering Expert...could you pretty please not throw racing's customers over the cliff any more....thank you"
|
If you have testimonials from racing fans they will never bet again or have no interest in racing because of what any tv or online analyst said or wrote please share because I think everyone on PA would love to see it.
The statements about customers falling to their death (suggesting they went broke and will never bet again) are like a political pundit saying voters stayed away from the polls because an another pundit stated none of the candidates were worth voting for. It can't be proven. Even polling may not work because people say they are going to do something (not vote) then go and do it anyway, or vice versa. Even if voting was down the suggestion 'A' or 'B' was the cause is only supposition. It is not proof of causation. The same goes for tying handle to any particular action or set of actions on the part of analysts.
Having an opinion your way is better and another person's is not as good is fine, and using that opinion to form a plan for helping fans and bettors is even better. The fan is better served by showing them what you want to show them and letting the negativity and sarcasm for online and tv analysts fall to the wayside.
I wish you all the best in those endeavors.
