Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 05-08-2022, 09:43 PM   #7
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
https://www.jan-6.com/2000-mules?gcl...iAAEgLz7PD_BwE

From the link.

The film “2000 Mules” uses a flawed analysis of cell phone geo-location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to try and prove election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

And: The movie’s evidence is a combination of anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cell phone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box.

A cellphone can be tracked to an area but not a specific location. Every cellphone that goes near a drop box doesn’t necessarily indicate that person was dropping off ballots.
As boxes are in busy areas, the likelihood of innocent citizens driving by is very high, especially delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers and elected officials who all have legitimate reasons to cross paths with numerous drop boxes or nonprofits in a given day.

Since the cellphone data is anonymized, there is no way to connect the persons in the video with the cellphone data. And there is no way to tell if the people in the video ate mules or simply people legally dropping off ballots for family members or for other legitimate reasons.

CLAIM: In Philadelphia alone, True the Vote identified 1,155 “mules” who illegally collected and dropped off ballots for money.

THE FACTS: No, it didn’t. The group hasn’t offered any evidence of any sort of paid ballot harvesting scheme in Philadelphia. And True the Vote did not get surveillance footage of drop boxes in Philadelphia, so the group based this claim solely on cellphone location data, its researcher Gregg Phillips said in March in testimony to Pennsylvania state senators.

As we said, cellphone data indicates you were in the neighborhood not what you were doing there.

If a cellphone went near a drop box more than 10 times and a nonprofit more than five times from Oct. 1 to Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a “mule” — its name for someone engaged in an illegal ballot collection scheme in cahoots with a nonprofit.

Oct 1 to Election Day was at least 33 days. Since drop boxes are logically going to be placed in busy areas, it would not be surprising to find many people who would pass by a drop box many times

Summarizing; geolocation is not precise enough to place. A phone at a drop box. Depositing multiple ballots is no proof of ballot harvesting. The makers of 2000 Mules know these things but choose to ignore them in favor of partisan politics.
You left out the part about the mules wearing gloves because their hands were cold, in AZ and Georgia, in early Nov. Yes, I always wear latex gloves outside when my hands are cold, and then thrown them out after depositing a bundle of ballots in the drop box.

Even dopey you must have thought that was a ridiculous claim.
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Dornoch - 67.74%
42 Votes
Track Phantom - 32.26%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 62
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.