Quote:
Originally Posted by steveb
Viable and useful yes; but I will stick to my opinion that nobody is going to be profitable with rankings as their ONLY factor.
And why would it be, when with basic data you could get many more viable factors to add to the whole?
Normalised and recency weighted throws up coefficients of .19 for me in HK, so yes, it is a strong factor, but why stick with .19 when higher can be had?
|
I do not have a horse in the race named "Convince SteveB to Agree With Me Stakes."