Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker7
I'm still getting a chuckle out of this thread. The premise is that the Baffert team was sooooo concerned about their stud (who had been 1/20 in his previous start) that they had to juice Justify.
|
Way to miss the point.
A test result for an overage of a banned substance was covered up in a closed session (and chairman of CHRB has had horses trained by Baffert) and nobody was informed. It was a positive for an illegal substance.
There is a reason it’s banned over a certain limit.... intention isn't the main point here, accidental or on purpose doesn't matter. Not sure why you can't get that.
However, if you read the studies, 300 is an insanely high level for accidental food contamination, which is where the intentional suspicions come in.
