Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-06-2024, 12:22 PM   #1
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,958
Remember that California bullet train thing?

__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2024, 12:47 PM   #2
Stevecsd2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 678
In the early 2000's, when I lived in California, when they were in the initial planning stages, we predicted it would cost at least 5 times as much as predicted at the beginning and take at least 3 times as long to build. We were way low in our estimates. That bridge cost over $1 billion per mile to build.


Phase 1 was planned to be about 170 miles for a cost of:

As of February 2024, the entire Phase 1 was projected to cost between $89–128 billion, with allowance for future inflation.



It will never come in at $128 billion. Taxpayers just keep getting suckered into these boondoggles. This will rival the big dig in Boston by the time it's done.
Stevecsd2 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2024, 02:20 PM   #3
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,220
Looking good LOL

tucker6 is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2024, 08:16 PM   #4
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
In Europe, rail travel is highly successful. 584,000.000.000 passenger kilometers in 2019. Of course that dropped during the pandemic, but is ratcheting up again. So, if they can do it, why can’t we? The answer is obvious. Short sightedness and stupidity.

When Amtrak was established, rural congressmen-Republicans-refused to vote for it unless trains were routed through small towns. Avoiding many larger cities. A perfect example is the California Zephyr; Chicago to San Francisco.
After the Zephyr leaves the Chicago area, it heads southwest across Illinois stopping at Princeton and Galesburg. It crosses the Mississippi into southern Iowa with stops in Burlington, Mt. Pleasant,Ottumwa, Osceola and Creston before arriving in Omaha. Those seven stops have a combined population of 136,441. I have been on the Zephyr several times. It’s a good day if thirty people total get on the train at those seven stops.

But what if there were.a different route for the zephyr? First stop out of Chicago is 90 miles west in Rockford, urban population 276,443. Then west and South to the Quad Cities. One stop for Rock Island/Moline on the Illinois side; One stop for Davenport/Bettandorf on the Iowa side. Quad Cities area has a population of 377,441. Next stop Dubuque/Clinton, pop. 78264. After that, we head to Iowa’s second largest city, Cedar Rapids population 278,520. Followed by Iowa City which is not only home to 171,487 people but is also the site of the University of Iowa. A lot of kids from the Chicago area attend U of Iowa. The last Major stop in Iowa would be Des Moines, which would also include Ames, Iowa. That area has a population of 607,000.

That route has a population of approximately 1,800,000. That’s 13 times the population of the actual route. And that’s just one section of one route.

The other dumb move was using the freight tracks and giving freight trains priority. For what? So they can get to their destination and wait a week to be unloaded.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2024, 08:25 PM   #5
Scamper
Registered User
 
Scamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Southern CA and Las Vegas
Posts: 106
And here people thought Mostie was a Democrat ...
go figure
Scamper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2024, 09:44 PM   #6
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
In Europe, rail travel is highly successful. 584,000.000.000 passenger kilometers in 2019. Of course that dropped during the pandemic, but is ratcheting up again. So, if they can do it, why can’t we? The answer is obvious. Short sightedness and stupidity.

When Amtrak was established, rural congressmen-Republicans-refused to vote for it unless trains were routed through small towns. Avoiding many larger cities. A perfect example is the California Zephyr; Chicago to San Francisco.
After the Zephyr leaves the Chicago area, it heads southwest across Illinois stopping at Princeton and Galesburg. It crosses the Mississippi into southern Iowa with stops in Burlington, Mt. Pleasant,Ottumwa, Osceola and Creston before arriving in Omaha. Those seven stops have a combined population of 136,441. I have been on the Zephyr several times. It’s a good day if thirty people total get on the train at those seven stops.

But what if there were.a different route for the zephyr? First stop out of Chicago is 90 miles west in Rockford, urban population 276,443. Then west and South to the Quad Cities. One stop for Rock Island/Moline on the Illinois side; One stop for Davenport/Bettandorf on the Iowa side. Quad Cities area has a population of 377,441. Next stop Dubuque/Clinton, pop. 78264. After that, we head to Iowa’s second largest city, Cedar Rapids population 278,520. Followed by Iowa City which is not only home to 171,487 people but is also the site of the University of Iowa. A lot of kids from the Chicago area attend U of Iowa. The last Major stop in Iowa would be Des Moines, which would also include Ames, Iowa. That area has a population of 607,000.

That route has a population of approximately 1,800,000. That’s 13 times the population of the actual route. And that’s just one section of one route.

The other dumb move was using the freight tracks and giving freight trains priority. For what? So they can get to their destination and wait a week to be unloaded.
and population density ... have you ever been out of a big city / suburb ?


If the freight trains own and maintain the tracks, who should have priority?


Amtrak is losing money already, you want them to build independent tracks?
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-06-2024, 09:53 PM   #7
jimmyb
Registered User
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baystater
Posts: 3,531
Biden is going to reroute it as part of his trans pacific railroad. Stop in beautiful New Guinea to visit the area of uncle Bosies demise.
jimmyb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-07-2024, 01:27 AM   #8
vegasone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 534
[QUOTE=After the Zephyr leaves the Chicago area, it heads southwest across Illinois stopping at Princeton and Galesburg[/QUOTE]


The Zephyr goes to Chicago and ends there
vegasone is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-09-2024, 05:39 PM   #9
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegasone View Post
The Zephyr goes to Chicago and ends there
Eastbound yes. There’s also westbound.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-09-2024, 05:47 PM   #10
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
and population density ... have you ever been out of a big city / suburb ?
That’s my whole point. Run your train where more people live and you will get more passengers.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-09-2024, 06:18 PM   #11
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
and population density ... have you ever been out of a big city / suburb ?


If the freight trains own and maintain the tracks, who should have priority?


Amtrak is losing money already, you want them to build independent tracks?
Amtrak pays $142,000,000 a year to use those tracks, shouldn’t that give them some rights?
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-09-2024, 06:55 PM   #12
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 113,104
Depends what their agreement says.

You know, that legal contract, that lawful people go by?

Google lawfyl if you need to.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Dornoch - 67.74%
42 Votes
Track Phantom - 32.26%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 62
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.