|
|
05-17-2012, 10:32 AM
|
#511
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
How beautiful. In your honor, instead of following the sport and betting this weekend, I'm going to write songs and post threads no one but cat lady's care about.
I feel so internet clever already.
|
And in your honor, I'll refrain from showering and wander around the grandstand cursing at children.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:26 AM
|
#512
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 832
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss9698
For those following along at home, let's look at the events of this week.
Sabini and Megna send a letter to NYRA condemning the announcement of Hayward and Keogh's replacements. They also inform NYRA that their revenue from the slots is going to be withheld.
http://www.racing.state.ny.us/pdf/05...5150703168.pdf
However, according to NYRA's response, they were instructed to name a replacement on May 1st by Sabini.
http://www.nyra.com/belmont/stories/May162012b.shtml
On May 1, 2012 Racing and Wagering Board Chairman John Sabini sent a letter to the NYRA Board of Directors, which stated “…it is imperative that you provide an interim operational plan to the Board, especially who will be performing functions as Chief Executive Officer and Counsel.” This letter contained no indication of any concerns or limitations with respect to these appointments. The NYRA Board acted to name a President and Secretary without any knowledge of any concerns by either the Franchise Oversight Board or the Racing and Wagering Board.
So two weeks after instructing NYRA to name replacements, they criticize them for it. If something as simple as naming replacements is this difficult, how do you guys think it was when NYRA asked for a takeout reduction?
Anyone still questioning what the real motives for Cuomo are here?
|
When did NYRA ask for a a takeout reduction?
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:28 AM
|
#513
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 832
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Already answered before I saw this. New York has shown at least some willingness to lower takeout over the years. They are also the industry leader, so maybe it would have worked. I think the purses would be so large they would almost have to draw bigger fields. Do I know it for a fact? Of course not. I was willing to wait for at least a year to see.
|
When did NYRA ask for a a takeout reduction?
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:31 AM
|
#514
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,844
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jelly
When did NYRA ask for a a takeout reduction?
|
You can use Google as well as I can.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:50 AM
|
#515
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jelly
When did NYRA ask for a a takeout reduction?
|
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...n-takeout-rate
There has been a long history of the state not wanting to reduce takeout while Hayward wanted to.
Take a look at the actual email from hayward to crist and read it first from the perspective that hayward prefers higher takeout and then from the perspective that he prefers lower takeout but doesn't think the state would approve and tell me in which version his response makes more sense.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:57 AM
|
#516
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenceBored
|
Thanks for posting the link. I agree, he strikes a very good balance on the issues. NYRA's appointment of McClain was ill-advised, under the circumstances. And your point about interim in Sabini's letter was right on as well. You're on a roll.
While I share everyone's distrust of Cuomo, the RWB, etc., NYRA isn't helping matters much. They need to come clean on the takeout issue. The "complexity of the racing law" and "it was an oversight" excuses just don't cut it. If they're trying to protect Hayward or others from possible legal action, they need to consider whether that's worth risking the franchise. As usual in these sorts of things, the coverup becomes more damaging than the crime.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 12:43 PM
|
#517
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 113,006
|
Unlike NYS, where EVERYONE in office has on goal - the steal as much money as possible from as many people as possible, NYRA is a business with goals and objectives and day-to-day operations to manage in a professional manner (again, something NYS would never understand). They needed to have people in these positions. Whether they were permanent of interim appointments
(there is no such thing as a permanent appointment anyways) is none of the State's business. It is NYRA's call.
On anther note, why wouldn't the state have gotten it's 15% of the 1%? NYRA changed nothing, so the state's cut should have been routine.
I want to know when Baby Mario is going to give it back.
He is NOT entitled to it, by his own un-trustworthy word.
Until he does, he is a thief and should be fired. Same as Hayward.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 12:49 PM
|
#518
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,761
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadWorld
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...n-takeout-rate
There has been a long history of the state not wanting to reduce takeout while Hayward wanted to.
Take a look at the actual email from hayward to crist and read it first from the perspective that hayward prefers higher takeout and then from the perspective that he prefers lower takeout but doesn't think the state would approve and tell me in which version his response makes more sense.
|
So, you're saying that they haven't really asked since Hayward agreed to the rate increase talked about in that article? In 2006, he traded higher takeout for a $20m loan and the ability to start NYRA Rewards. Seems like he had other priorities than keeping takeout low.
Flash forward to that email to Crist, Hayward puts preventing opposition to his new restaurant/bar project ahead of asking to reduce takeouts to their pre-Sept. 2008 levels. That's your idea of a man itching to ask for a takeout reduction?
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:01 PM
|
#519
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenceBored
So, you're saying that they haven't really asked since Hayward agreed to the rate increase talked about in that article? In 2006, he traded higher takeout for a $20m loan and the ability to start NYRA Rewards. Seems like he had other priorities than keeping takeout low.
Flash forward to that email to Crist, Hayward puts preventing opposition to his new restaurant/bar project ahead of asking to reduce takeouts to their pre-Sept. 2008 levels. That's your idea of a man itching to ask for a takeout reduction?
|
Rebates are a reduction in takeout.
So we agree that it looks like he was saying in the letter that he would like to reduce takeouts but it would upset the board to ask and they might not be as likely to approve other bettor friendly options?
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:24 PM
|
#520
|
Racing Form Detective
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne but my heart is at Santa Anita
Posts: 16,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
You can use Google as well as I can.
|
I googled "NYRA asks for a takeout reduction" There was nothing in the first 10 pages except about a reduction to make up for the overcharges. Perhaps you can use google better than me. In fact, that is highly likely. Did anybody find a link to a time when NYRA asked for a takeout reduction? If so, please post it and how did you get. Thanks.
__________________
Some day in the not too distant future, horse players will betting on computer generated races over the net. Race tracks will become casinos and shopping centers. And some crooner will be belting out "there used to be a race track here".
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:25 PM
|
#521
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,459
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by usedtolovetvg
They're all snakes. Hayward just managed to feign sincerity better than the rest. He did a good job bamboozling a lot of people. That's what the good ones do. Talk is cheap.
|
Let me ask you a question if I may. When you worked at TVG did your employers try to use almost the same tactics? Did you ever speak up? Or were you just the silent type who wanted to keep his job?
This isn't a knock on you personally but one has to wonder with all the stuff that has gone down at TVG did you ever speak passionately about the same issues?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:33 PM
|
#522
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,844
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goren
I googled "NYRA asks for a takeout reduction" There was nothing in the first 10 pages except about a reduction to make up for the overcharges. Perhaps you can use google better than me. In fact, that is highly likely. Did anybody find a link to a time when NYRA asked for a takeout reduction? If so, please post it and how did you get. Thanks.
|
I don't need to use Google, I know the history.
At the very least you realize the cut from 26 to 24 as compensation for the initial error was set as the permanent rate, right? This wasn't required.
Last edited by cj; 05-17-2012 at 01:34 PM.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:35 PM
|
#523
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 667
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canarsie
Let me ask you a question if I may. When you worked at TVG did your employers try to use almost the same tactics? Did you ever speak up? Or were you just the silent type who wanted to keep his job?
This isn't a knock on you personally but one has to wonder with all the stuff that has gone down at TVG did you ever speak passionately about the same issues?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
|
That's how I lost my job.
Last edited by usedtolovetvg; 05-17-2012 at 01:37 PM.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:37 PM
|
#524
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,844
|
Quote:
Charles Hayward:
First and foremost, while our takeout rates are high, they're far from the highest in the country. I agree that takeout on NYRA races is higher than it should be for the customer, as well as for the economic benefit of NYRA. The entire racing industry suffers from takeout rates that are too high, thus reducing the return to our customers, and reducing the return back into our pools. In the case of New York and NYRA, there is a morass of statutory legislation, particularly in regard to the OTBs, that is economically devastating to NYRA. I will give you just one example. If a Capital OTB customer during the Saratoga race meet bets $100 either at Capital OTB, over the internet, or on the phone sitting on a bench at Saratoga Race Course, NYRA's return on that $100 of wagering activity is one dollar and 25 cents. Once NYRA's finances are stabilized, my highest priority will be on takeout reduction for the racing customer and the financial well being of the entire industry.
|
Unfortunately, he never got the chance.
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 01:54 PM
|
#525
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,844
|
Quote:
Charles Hayward: “Yesterday, Gov. [David] Paterson signed into law a bill repealing a proposed takeout increase on wagers placed on out-of-state races. The New York Racing Association joins other industry stakeholders in applauding both the Governor’s and the legislature’s leadership on this issue. With this repeal, our elected officials have helped level the playing field for both the vital New York racing industry and the many thousand racing enthusiasts in the state.”
|
It looks to me like Hayward has had to constantly fight against increases in takeout before he was able to try for cuts. Too bad he wasn't in California I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|