Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-21-2013, 02:51 PM   #1
Al Gobbi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 997
Exchange rules rejected by California Office of Administrative Law

The California Office of Administrative Law recently rejected rules permitting exchange wagering in the state, but has yet to give a reason for the rejection, a California Horse Racing Board spokesman said on Wednesday.

The racing board approved rules for exchange wagering in November 2012, and sent documents to the Office of Administrative Law earlier this year for legal review. That office rejected the rules earlier this month, but has yet to publish its findings. Companies such as TVG-Betfair have supported the implementation of exchange wagering.

http://www.drf.com/news/exchange-bet...nistrative-law
Al Gobbi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2013, 09:49 PM   #2
Socalracefan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 9
Interesting. We will have to see how that develops. I hear about exchange wagering all the time here in Southern California on the Roger Stein show. He really seems to be the only one discussing it.
Socalracefan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2013, 11:15 PM   #3
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,582
Betfair

It's going to be a big setback for Betfair and, ultimately, TVG when exchange wagering finally goes six feet under in the US - and it will.

Those involved in UK gambling don't fully understand the US gaming environment, and vice versa.
Exchange wagering stands about the same chance as sports betting in this country - slim to none.

Why is that?
Because it's bookmaking.

Just because you dress a duck up differently, if you see it waddle, and you spot the webbed feet, you know it's still a duck.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2013, 11:37 PM   #4
usedtolovetvg
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 667
You quack me up.
usedtolovetvg is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-22-2013, 03:42 AM   #5
Some_One
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,911
Just another example of how close minded Americans are, say goodbye to TVG and Cali racing.
Some_One is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-22-2013, 05:03 AM   #6
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some_One
Just another example of how close minded Americans are, say goodbye to TVG and Cali racing.
They're only closed minded because there's nothing in it for THEM. If they thought exchange wagering would create a situation where the horseman would stuff their pockets with newfound revenue, you can bet your bottom dollar there would be zero opposition to this.....bookmaking or not.

Also, an exchange wager is no different than betting on a 10 horse field....if you bet on one horse in a 10 horse field, you're essentially betting against the other 9 runners...no different than an exchange wager.

Del Mar didnt seem to have a problem offering win wagering on the Julie Krone/P Val match race a bunch of years ago and didnt have a problem 'booking' a two horse race with Mike and Chantal raced recently. Oh yeah, i forgot, normal 17 % takeout on that 'matchup', never mind, its ok to 'book' as long as the rake is what it normally is.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-24-2013, 03:25 PM   #7
Al Gobbi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 997
California's plan for exchange wagering sustains major setback

The launch of exchange wagering in California will be delayed for months, and possibly into 2014, after the state’s Office of Administrative Law recently cited extensive faults to a set of rules approved in 2012 by the California Horse Racing Board.

In a 19-page decision of disapproval published last Thursday, George C. Shaw, the Office of Administrative Law’s senior counsel, called for revisions to eight of the 25 rules. In a statement, the racing board said that the Office of Administrative Law cited “failure to comply with the specified standards of necessity, consistency, and clarity.”

http://www.drf.com/news/californias-...-major-setback
Al Gobbi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-24-2013, 03:56 PM   #8
SandyW
Registered User
 
SandyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Gobbi
The launch of exchange wagering in California will be delayed for months, and possibly into 2014, after the state’s Office of Administrative Law recently cited extensive faults to a set of rules approved in 2012 by the California Horse Racing Board.

In a 19-page decision of disapproval published last Thursday, George C. Shaw, the Office of Administrative Law’s senior counsel, called for revisions to eight of the 25 rules. In a statement, the racing board said that the Office of Administrative Law cited “failure to comply with the specified standards of necessity, consistency, and clarity.”

http://www.drf.com/news/californias-...-major-setback
According to California officials in the know, exchange wagering is as dead as kelsey's you know what for the near and for the foreseeable future.

Last edited by SandyW; 03-24-2013 at 03:57 PM.
SandyW is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-24-2013, 08:09 PM   #9
edmond1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 168
Betfair wake up !!!! Sell TVG so that you can then re-offer markets on California tracks.....Can't see it working out in U.S. anyway -10% commissions too high/ too many obstacles(state/country)..... HOW MUCH MORE MONEY CAN YOU AFFORD TO BLOW......
edmond1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-24-2013, 08:32 PM   #10
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,664
It's sad, but US racing probably deserves to die the slow death it's going through now given the way it's run. This industry is a comedy of errors, stupidity, shortsightedness, corruption, incompetence etc... It's not even like there aren't workable models we can learn from overseas. Yet we learn nothing and continue to do everything wrong right in the face of basic business and economics. I almost wish I didn't have any family obligations. I'd probably pack my bags and play horses in Australia or somewhere else.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"

Last edited by classhandicapper; 03-24-2013 at 08:34 PM.
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-24-2013, 10:26 PM   #11
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper
It's sad, but US racing probably deserves to die the slow death it's going through now given the way it's run. This industry is a comedy of errors, stupidity, shortsightedness, corruption, incompetence etc... It's not even like there aren't workable models we can learn from overseas. Yet we learn nothing and continue to do everything wrong right in the face of basic business and economics. I almost wish I didn't have any family obligations. I'd probably pack my bags and play horses in Australia or somewhere else.
You hit the nail on the head here.

People who have pull in this game just won't ever listen to people who know more than they do about the sport. Players panel came out with a bunch of great suggestions about 10 years ago and we're still talking about basic stuff. Some tracks cant even figure out how to time their races properly.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-24-2013, 10:35 PM   #12
usedtolovetvg
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 667
Nobody gives a s**t what the player wants. Like everyone else they are just protecting their paychecks and payoffs (not payouts). If the guys in charge of any business actually cared about their customers, this country would be a lot better off. But.. they don't.
usedtolovetvg is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-25-2013, 10:03 AM   #13
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some_One
Just another example of how close minded Americans are, say goodbye to TVG and Cali racing.
Close-minded? To not want to just hand over millions to Betfair? If Betfair wants to get a cut of the handle, why don't they go and make an investment in a track? No, they just want to be the leech who siphons off a big chunk of racing's profits - on the backs of the owners and bettors.
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-25-2013, 12:31 PM   #14
Charli125
Registered User
 
Charli125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan
Close-minded? To not want to just hand over millions to Betfair? If Betfair wants to get a cut of the handle, why don't they go and make an investment in a track? No, they just want to be the leech who siphons off a big chunk of racing's profits - on the backs of the owners and bettors.
That about summarizes the position of the industry. With that mindset, handle will continue to dwindle and the industry will wonder where everyone went.

According to that way of thinking, online stock trading platforms, like Scottrade, are leeches, who just want to siphon off a big chunk of profits.
__________________
"Support Tracks That Support Players" Some Random Horseplayer-2011
Charli125 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-25-2013, 02:42 PM   #15
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan
Close-minded? To not want to just hand over millions to Betfair? If Betfair wants to get a cut of the handle, why don't they go and make an investment in a track? No, they just want to be the leech who siphons off a big chunk of racing's profits - on the backs of the owners and bettors.
The idea is to create a model that is mutually beneficial to Betfair, the industry, and the players.

Exchange wagering for the player and Betfair is a no brainer. It can't happen fast enough.

So it comes down to attracting enough new money to the industry to more than offset the profits of Betfair and net out to extra money for the industry.

Most people believe that in order to attract new money to the industry you have to make the game more attractive and more competitive with poker, sports gambling, illegal off shore rebate sites, etc

The take is lower on the exchange and also gives you the added benefit of being able to lock in prices and book bets - both of which make it more appealing and competitive. The model appears to be working in other countries.

This feels like we have a huge pie in the refrigerator, but the host would rather starve itself to death than put it on the kitchen table because it wants to stuff itself with the biggest slice.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Dornoch - 67.74%
42 Votes
Track Phantom - 32.26%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 62
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.