|
|
03-03-2016, 06:29 PM
|
#136
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,695
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
If this Canadian-dipstick can't control his campaign staff, how can anyone expect him to control the country?
Cruz is a loser. A liar. A fraud. A jerk.
And an honorary POS.
|
Being a typical politician, he probably told the staff to do it. When it did not turn out the way he hoped, he threw them under the bus. They are lucky the weren't working for the Clinton's, they would be dead.
|
|
|
03-05-2016, 10:38 AM
|
#137
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Where is the outrage?!!!?
Glenn Beck Friday on his radio show "...if I were close enough and had a knife...really, I mean...the stabbing wouldn't stop."
He was scheduled to take the stage prior to Trump at the CPAC event later in the day.
Not even Cruz who accepted his endorsement has responded.
Personaly I would trust David Duke more than this nutjob.
Threats over live radio and nothing but crickets!!!!
I can see him losing it and bringing down wasTEDS nomination with him.
Its almost like he never said it, it never really happened at all.
|
|
|
03-05-2016, 02:09 PM
|
#138
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodtoo
Where is the outrage?!!!?
Glenn Beck Friday on his radio show "...if I were close enough and had a knife...really, I mean...the stabbing wouldn't stop."
He was scheduled to take the stage prior to Trump at the CPAC event later in the day.
Not even Cruz who accepted his endorsement has responded.
Personaly I would trust David Duke more than this nutjob.
Threats over live radio and nothing but crickets!!!!
I can see him losing it and bringing down wasTEDS nomination with him.
Its almost like he never said it, it never really happened at all.
|
It's Glenn Beck/ Mitt Romney/ John McCain, etc....who cares?? Always crickets for losers....
|
|
|
03-05-2016, 06:28 PM
|
#139
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: st louis
Posts: 3,029
|
Cruz crushes the field in the Kansas caucus. He has just over 50 percent with 75 percent reporting.
__________________
You will never achieve 100% if 99% is okay!
|
|
|
03-05-2016, 06:30 PM
|
#140
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
It's Glenn Beck/ Mitt Romney/ John McCain, etc....who cares?? Always crickets for losers....
|
It was only Beck who made the threat.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 12:43 AM
|
#141
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,861
|
Cruz won Kansas and Maine today and picked up 64 delegates.
Trump picked up 49 with KY and Louisiana wins.
The interesting thing is that KS and ME are both caucus states while KY and LA are not.
from huffpost:
Quote:
Cruz won in caucus states, where turnout is much lower, and they favor candidates who are extremely well organized, rather than ones like Trump, who are bringing disaffected voters back into the system. Only two remaining states, Hawaii and Utah, hold caucuses rather than primaries.
Trump is not set up to win caucus states, because his strategy relies entirely around free media exposure. He bought no air time on major stations in Kansas City, Missouri, or Wichita, Kansas, for instance, and didn't appear in the state until Saturday.
|
So with only two caucus states remaining, HI and UT, it looks like Trump is in good position to win the nomination.
However, if Trump wins by less than 50% then at the convention the GOP could nominate someone with popularity within the party, like Paul Ryan.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 01:42 AM
|
#142
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by highnote
Cruz won Kansas and Maine today and picked up 64 delegates.
Trump picked up 49 with KY and Louisiana wins.
The interesting thing is that KS and ME are both caucus states while KY and LA are not.
from huffpost:
So with only two caucus states remaining, HI and UT, it looks like Trump is in good position to win the nomination.
However, if Trump wins by less than 50% then at the convention the GOP could nominate someone with popularity within the party, like Paul Ryan.
|
And essentially hand Hillary the Presidency.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 03:40 AM
|
#143
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
And essentially hand Hillary the Presidency.
|
The GOP establishment acts like they would rather see Clinton win than Trump.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 06:48 AM
|
#144
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,818
|
Cruz has been winning the low turnout states. bad sign for him if he was the nominee.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#145
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,664
|
I keep reading that Cruz is only winning the caucus states and Trump is winning the primaries, but some of the republican primaries allow independents and even democrats to cross over and vote. Those voters are going for Trump on trade and illegal immigration. So the primaries are overstating his popularity on the conservative side.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 12:25 PM
|
#146
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,851
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zico20
Cruz crushes the field in the Kansas caucus. He has just over 50 percent with 75 percent reporting.
|
Yes that and $2 gets you a win ticket on Fluffandstuff in the 5th at Charlestown!
__________________
Remember the NJ horseman got you here now do the right thing with the purses!
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 12:35 PM
|
#147
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by highnote
The GOP establishment acts like they would rather see Clinton win than Trump.
|
They would prefer Clinton or anyone over Trump, this is totally acceptable to them. Their place at the trough would remain and that is all they really care about.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 12:42 PM
|
#148
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodtoo
They would prefer Clinton or anyone over Trump, this is totally acceptable to them. Their place at the trough would remain and that is all they really care about.
|
That is exactly why GOP is panicking. There is a huge amount of money in play here and Trump may not be so quick to fall into line and swallow the bait of poor contracts with respect to Big Pharma and the Military -Industrial complex.
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 12:47 PM
|
#149
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper
I keep reading that Cruz is only winning the caucus states and Trump is winning the primaries, but some of the republican primaries allow independents and even democrats to cross over and vote. Those voters are going for Trump on trade and illegal immigration. So the primaries are overstating his popularity on the conservative side.
|
Cruz is doing better in the closed primaries, where only registered Republicans can vote the GOP ticket, and Trump is doing better in open primaries. Data seems to indicate that a lot of Dems are crossing over and voting for Trump on the GOP side. Whether they will do so in the general remains to be seen, or if they are just trying to screw with the GOP. Especially given Trump's backing off on his initial strong stand on immigration.
More the of the recent primaries have been open, more of the upcoming primaries will be closed, which favors Cruz.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
03-06-2016, 01:03 PM
|
#150
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
Data seems to indicate that a lot of Dems are crossing over and voting for Trump on the GOP side. Whether they will do so in the general remains to be seen, or if they are just trying to screw with the GOP.
|
If the dems are switching over in the primary to screw the GOP establishment then that is an interesting strategy, but I don't think the dems are organized enough to pull off that large of a conspiracy because the GOP voters could also switch over and vote for Sanders.
So if it is happening it is by happenstance and not a vast left or right wing conspiracy or game theory. It would make the election more interesting if it was, though!
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|